Sec 182.of your Indian Agreement Act, 1872 states that “An ‘agent’ is an individual utilized to do an act for one more or to stand for A different in dealings with third individual. The individual for whom these kinds of act is done, or that’s so represented, is called the principal”
Where a person employs another to do an act for him or to characterize him in dealings with third events, the person so utilized is referred to as an agent. In the theory on the English law, the agent is usually a connecting line amongst the principal & 3rd get-togethers. He can be an middleman that has the facility to create legal interactions in between the principal plus the third events.
Sec. two(13) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines that “‘director’ contains anyone occupying the posture of the director by whatever name referred to as”
As a result, director is someone lawfully appointed on the Board of Directors of an organization that’s duly constituted to direct, control and supervise the actions and affairs of a company. Administrators of a business are in the eye of regulation agents of the business for which they act and the overall ideas of the law of principal and agent control in most respects the connection of the business and its administrators. (Somayazula vs. Hope Prodhome & Co. (1963) 2 An W.R. 112.)
The take a look at of company is whether or not the individual is purporting to enter into transaction on behalf of the principal or not. As a way to constitute an agency, It isn’t necessary to have a formal settlement.
A director of an organization is not really necessarily the agent of the corporate or of its shareholder, however the genuine posture of the administrators of an organization may well that be of agents for the corporation with powers and duties of carrying on The entire of its small business, issue to the restrictions imposed from the Article content of Association. A Director or even a controlling director might not be a servant of the organization; he can be an agent of the corporation for carrying on its business enterprise. What He’s the truth is will depend upon the details and circumstances of every scenario. Most of the time, neither the board of administrators nor an individual director is, as a result, an agent of the organization, or even the Company, or its associates. Less than modern-day legislation, all powers of management, other than People expressly reserved towards the shareholders generally speaking meeting, are vested from the board of directors, which have powers to appoint officers who are topic to your supervision and Charge of the board. Users of the board resemble brokers in that they act on behalf of Other folks, and so are fiduciaries owing into the responsibilities of loyalty and treatment. On the other hand, these obligations are owed to the company human body by itself instead of for the shareholders. A person director, as a result, has even now much less resemblance to an agent than has the board as being a physique. Even though he acts as member with the board, he won’t act as an agent, but as among the list of group which supervises the pursuits of your Company. On the other hand, he can be appointed an agent in the integrated body.
Director as an agent: The Madras Significant Court observed that Generally a director isn’t an agent of the corporation but the place he functions for a director- in- charge and corresponds with One more occasion to provide a few deal He’ll work as an agent. As a result the liability is of the organization and not the agent personally. (Puddokottah Textiles Ltd. vs. B.R. Adityan (1975) 88 Mad. L. W. 688, 790)
The court has electrical power below its equitable jurisdiction to award curiosity Each time somebody inside a fiduciary posture, such as Director of Business, misuses money that he controls in his fiduciary potential. Whenever the transaction in which The cash utilized was of a commercial mother nature the court will presume that it absolutely was financially rewarding as well as court will give adequate payment for that profits assumed to are actually designed. (Wallersteiner vs. Moir (1975) one All E.R. 849, 865)
The Supreme Court has explained the Place of work of the Director Hence,
“The Director of a Company will not be a servant but an agent inasmuch as a business cannot act in its individual individual but only by its administrators, who qua the business Have got a partnership of an agent to your principal.” (Ramprasad Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (1973) A. Sc. 637, 640; Commissioner of Revenue Tax Vs. Gentleman Mohandas (1966) A. Sc. 743; 59, I.T.R. – 699)
A taking care of Director can have a dual capability. He may possibly both of those be a director and an staff. He has don’t just the persona of the director but also the persona of the worker or an agent dependant upon phrases of his employment and the Company’s Posts Affiliation. The phrase ‘staff’ is facile more than enough to deal with equally these relationships.
An agent though certain to workout his authority in accordance with lawful Directions specified to him will not be topic to the direct Command and supervision with the principal. A Running Director of a business if he is to act beneath the Instructions of the board of Administrators is actually a servant.
A Running Director has two functions and two capacities. Being a Running director He’s below a contract with the business and this contract is deal of work. More especially It is just a agreement of company instead of for service.
A Director of an organization just isn’t automatically an agent of the company or its shareholders. If he functions as an agent he should exclusively say so. So wherever in his published statement a director didn’t increase this kind of plea, He’s deemed to have acted on his own ability. So a match towards him alone is not really barred by Sections 230 and 235 with the Contract Act. (Raja Ram Jaiswal vs. Ganesh Parshad, AIR 1959 All 29)
Taking care of Director benefiting himself: A Controlling Director appointed for 10 yrs resigned his article which the business refused to accept and as a consequence he was even now in service. When getting ostensibly in service his putting orders with the corporation’s suppliers and dealings with consumers, was breach of his responsibility and fidelity and great faith as Director not to learn personally by contracts ostensibly entered into on behalf of the corporate. (Thomas Marshall Exports Ltd. v. Guinde (1978)) A Learn is liable for the torts of his servant committed through the study course of his employment irrespective of the master deriving any reward. An agent’s purpose is to enter into relations on behalf of his principal with third individuals. He acts at his discretion and judgment but within the restrictions of his authority.